Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Constrained multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (CMOEAs) typically integrate diverse evolutionary operators, constraint-handling techniques, and environmental selection (ES) strategies to address constrained multi-objective optimization problems (CMOPs). Notably, significant performance variations emerge when identical CMOEAs employ different operators for solving the same CMOP, a phenomenon arising from distinct operator preferences exhibited by CMOPs with varied landscape. Therefore, it is worthwhile and promising to adaptively select appropriate operators for different CMOPs. This paper proposes CMOFLCS, a novel framework incorporating a fuzzy logic control system (FLCS). We introduce dual metrics for assessing population convergence and diversity, combined with a reward mechanism that dynamically evaluates operators' historical contributions. These metrics feed into the FLCS, which synergizes expert-defined rules with real-time data feedback to probabilistically select optimal operators via roulette wheel. Furthermore, we develop an angle-constrained ES that redirects inefficient exploration of the unconstrained Pareto front (UPF) to a uniform search of the objective space in the UPFto- constrained Pareto front (CPF) direction. This mechanism activates adaptively when handling problems with complete UPF-CPF separation. Experiments on 33 benchmark problems and 25 real-world applications demonstrate that CMOFLCS achieves superior performance, outperforming eight state-of-theart CMOEAs. Significantly, FLCS integration enhances baseline performance when embedded into two popular CMOEAs, further validating both its effectiveness and generalizability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: