Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Whether and how phonology contributes to semantic access in visual word recognition has long been a central issue in reading research. From a connectionist perspective, the present study used corpus-based measures to quantify the mappings between orthography, phonology and semantics in Chinese and tested how these mappings predicted performance in a large-scale lexical decision task. The results showed that the contribution of phonology to meaning-related processing in Chinese character recognition is conditional on the reliability of orthography-to-semantics mappings: when these mappings were relatively weak, phonology predicted reaction times more strongly. Further comparison among candidate mappings indicated that neither the phonology-to-semantics mapping nor sublexical phonology-to-orthography feedback interacted with orthography-to-semantics consistency, whereas whole-character phonology-to-orthography feedback did. This effect emerged when orthography-to-semantics consistency was low. These findings provide new evidence for a connectionist account of meaning-related processing in Chinese.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
gheni et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: