Key result
Evidence for managing AF/AFL around HCT remains limited and largely extrapolated across clinical guidelines.
Systematic Review
This systematic scoping evidence map highlights critical evidence gaps in managing atrial fibrillation and flutter across the hematopoietic cell transplantation continuum and proposes a hypothesis-generating, phase-specific care framework.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evidence gaps in HCT-related AF/AFL warrant cautious extrapolation from non-transplant data; leaves open dedicated trials on treatment, surveillance, and anticoagulation.
Purpose of Review Atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter (AF/AFL) are clinically relevant complications across the haematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) continuum, but evidence supporting phase-specific management and transitions of care remains fragmented. This review aimed to map direct HCT-AF evidence, broader HCT cardiovascular evidence, and relevant guidance; identify major evidence-to-care gaps; and define an evidence-informed framework for AF/AFL management across the HCT continuum. Recent Findings We conducted a systematic scoping evidence map of PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, supplemented by a predefined closed hand-search of guidance sources. Twenty-seven clinical reports and 15 guidance documents were retained, yielding 42 evidence sources. Direct evidence was concentrated on AF/AFL incidence, timing, predictors, recurrence, and prognosis, whereas evidence for treatment selection, rhythm-surveillance strategies, anticoagulation during thrombocytopenia, and survivorship follow-up remained limited and frequently dependent on extrapolated guidance. The evidence map informed a phase-specific care framework spanning pre-HCT risk assessment, risk-adapted rhythm surveillance, structured acute AF/AFL assessment, dynamic anticoagulation reassessment, medication-safety review, and accountable discharge and survivorship follow-up. Summary AF/AFL after HCT should be viewed as a longitudinal care challenge rather than an isolated inpatient arrhythmic event. The proposed phase-specific quality-of-care processes are hypothesis-generating and require prospective evaluation for feasibility, reproducibility, implementation, and association with clinical outcomes. Graphical Abstract Atrial fibrillation across the HCT continuum. Evidence-informed, phase-specific framework integrating AF/AFL risk assessment, risk-adapted rhythm surveillance, acute management, dynamic anticoagulation reassessment, medication-safety review, survivorship care, and key evidence-to-care gaps across the HCT continuum. The lower panel highlights system-level enablers for integrating AF-HCT care, including multidisciplinary care, structured processes, data collection, education, care-transition communication, and continuous quality assessment. The proposed framework and candidate quality-of-care processes are hypothesis-generating and require prospective validation. AF, atrial fibrillation; AFL, atrial flutter; BNP, B-type natriuretic peptide; BTK, Bruton tyrosine kinase; CV, cardiovascular; ECG, electrocardiogram; HCT, haematopoietic cell transplantation; QTc, corrected QT interval
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saraullo et al. (2026) conducted a systematic review in Atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter across the hematopoietic cell transplantation continuum. Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) was evaluated on Evidence mapping of AF/AFL incidence, timing, predictors, recurrence, prognosis, and phase-specific management across the HCT continuum. Systematic scoping review of 42 sources (27 reports, 15 guidelines) found HCT-related AF/AFL treatment, surveillance, and anticoagulation evidence remains limited and extrapolated.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: