Key result
Atherosclerotic plaque proteins show higher amyloid-forming potential than the overall human proteome.
Why the study?
Atherosclerotic plaques persist despite containing proteases capable of degrading their proteins, raising the possibility that plaque proteins morph into proteolysis-resistant amyloid forms.
Computational and observational evidence shows that proteins in atherosclerotic plaques are significantly enriched for amyloid-forming potential compared to the general human proteome, which may explain plaque resistance to proteolytic degradation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May explain plaque persistence via amyloid states; hypothesis-generating for amyloid-targeted interventions in atherosclerosis.
Atherosclerotic plaques cause many acute cardiovascular events, including myocardial infarction and ischaemic stroke. Diseases of this type are effectively the leading causes of death worldwide. Plaques contain many proteases that can normally degrade their proteins. The fact that plaques exist means they must grow faster than they are broken down. An amyloid is an ordered, fibre-like misfolded state of a protein. As is well known, amyloid forms of proteins can be much more resistant to proteolysis than are their non-amyloid forms. Thus, one possibility is that many of these atherosclerotic proteins have morphed into amyloid forms. First, we summarise the extensive evidence for this, that is both observational (using various amyloid-structure-determining methods) and computational (using the program AmyloGram that provides a sequence-based score (0–1) of predicted amyloid-forming potential), showing that the amyloid(ogenic) potential of proteins found in plaques is significantly greater than that of most typical proteins. Thus, while 79% of human proteins have an AmyloGram score exceeding 0.7, with a median value of 0.81, typically more than 90% of proteins in plaques have AmyloGram scores exceeding 0.7, with a median score around 0.86. The probability-of-superiority values are around 0.615–0.627 against the human proteome. In addition, a Mann-Whitney test bootstrapped 20,000 times gave a 95% CI 0.0411–0.0497 for the difference in median AmyloGram score in Lewy bodies vs. the human proteome. Secondly, while there is no significant relation between the overall hydropathy (average hydrophobicity) and amyloidogenic tendency (amyloid-forming potential) of individual proteins, we recognise that amyloid forms of proteins expose many hydrophobic surface patches. These can act as scaffolds for other hydrophobic constituents of plaque. Overall the extensive new evidence provided here of an enrichment of amyloid forms of proteins in atherosclerotic and similar plaques can account, at least in part, for their resistance to proteolytic degradation. This has therapeutic implications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kell et al. (2026) conducted a review in Atherosclerosis. Atherosclerotic plaque proteins vs. Overall human proteome was evaluated on Predicted amyloid-forming potential (AmyloGram score) (Probability of superiority 0.615-0.627). Proteins found in atherosclerotic plaques exhibit significantly higher amyloid-forming potential (median AmyloGram score ~0.86 vs 0.81; probability of superiority 0.615-0.627) than the human proteome.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: