Key result
CPET in an adolescent swimmer with pectus excavatum shows normal exercise capacity despite thoracic deformity.
Why the study?
Pectus excavatum alters thoracic geometry and may affect cardiac filling and respiratory mechanics, although anatomical severity does not necessarily lead to functional limitations. This study examined the integrated physiological response from rest to maximal exercise and recovery in an asymptomatic, competitive adolescent swimmer with pectus excavatum.
Case Report (n=1)
No
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Anatomical severity of pectus excavatum (Haller index 3.3) does not necessarily cause functional impairment, highlighting the value of combining resting echocardiography and spirometry with CPET in evaluating athletes with chest wall deformities.
Background and Objectives: Pectus excavatum (PE) alters thoracic geometry and may affect cardiac filling and respiratory mechanics. However, anatomical severity does not necessarily lead to functional limitations. This case study examined the integrated physiological response from rest to maximal exercise and recovery in an asymptomatic, competitive adolescent swimmer with PE. Methods: A 16-year-old male competitive swimmer with asymmetric pectus excavatum (Park type 2A; Haller index 3.3) underwent pulmonary function testing and resting two-dimensional echocardiography, as well as cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Results: From rest to maximal exercise, VO2 increased approximately 5.9-fold, from 576 to 3378 mL·min−1 (45.0 mL·kg−1·min−1; 92% predicted; AT: 41.2 mL·kg−1·min−1), while oxygen pulse increased from 6.0 to 17.9 mL O2·beat−1 (AT: 17.0 mL O2·beat−1) and OB from 30.3 to 91.3 mL O2·breath−1 (AT: 83.5 mL O2·breath−1). PQR was 5.05 at rest and 5.11 beats·breath−1 at peak (AT: 4.92 beats·breath−1), while peak VE/MVV reached 56.0% (AT: 48.6%). Pulmonary function testing showed a forced vital capacity at 120% of predicted, forced expiratory volume in one second at 119% of the predicted value and maximal inspiratory pressure was 120% of the predicted value. Resting echocardiography revealed preserved left ventricular longitudinal myocardial deformation (GLS −21.8%) and a transmitral E/A ratio of 1.46. Conclusions: Despite having a thoracic deformity, the athlete demonstrated preserved resting function and an integrated cardiopulmonary response to maximal exercise, with no ventilatory limitations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stavrou et al. (2026) conducted a case report in Asymmetric pectus excavatum (Park type 2A; Haller index 3.3) (n=1). Pectus excavatum (Park type 2A; Haller index 3.3) evaluated via integrated pulmonary function testing, resting echocardiography, and cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) vs. Predicted reference values was evaluated on Peak oxygen uptake (VO2) during cardiopulmonary exercise testing. An adolescent swimmer with pectus excavatum (Haller index 3.3) achieved a 5.9-fold increase in VO2 to 3378 mL/min (92% predicted) and oxygen pulse of 17.9 mL/beat without ventilatory limitation.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: