Key result
Coronary artery calcium scoring correlated moderately with maximum stenosis severity (r=0.543, p<0.001), with CAC >=100 showing 100% specificity and 38.5% sensitivity for significant CAD.
Why the study?
Coronary artery calcium scoring provides a non-invasive assessment of calcified atherosclerotic burden, and its predictive value and correlation with coronary CT angiography findings in clinically suspected CAD needed evaluation.
Does coronary artery calcium scoring accurately predict coronary stenosis severity on coronary CT angiography in patients with clinically suspected CAD?
Observational (n=196)
No
Does coronary artery calcium scoring accurately predict coronary stenosis severity on coronary CT angiography in patients with clinically suspected CAD?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In patients with suspected CAD, a CAC score >=100 provides 100% specificity for significant stenosis on CCTA, though its low sensitivity (38.5%) and NPV (56.5%) confirm that low or zero CAC cannot rule out obstructive CAD.
Background:. Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring provides a non-invasive assessment of calcified atherosclerotic burden and may assist in predicting coronary stenosis. Aims and Objectives: To evaluate the predictive value of CAC scoring and its correlation with coronary CT angiography (CCTA) findings in clinically suspected CAD. Materials and Methods: This prospective observational study included 196 patients with clinically suspected CAD at the Department of Radio-Diagnosis, Maharani Laxmi Bai Medical College, Jhansi, from March 2025 to February 2026. CAC was quantified using the Agatston method and correlated with coronary stenosis severity Results: The mean age was 49.6 years, and 57.1% were male. Diabetes mellitus was the most common risk factor. The mean CAC score was 79.6±127.9. CAC showed a significant moderate positive correlation with maximum stenosis severity (r=0.543, p<0.001). At a CAC threshold ≥100, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy for significant CAD were 38.5%, 100%, 100%, 56.5%, and 65.8%, respectively. Conclusion: Increasing CAC scores were significantly associated with greater coronary stenosis. CAC scoring is useful for risk stratification and identifying patients at increased risk of significant CAD; however, low or zero CAC cannot reliably exclude obstructive disease and should be interpreted alongside clinical findings and CCTA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meena et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Clinically suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) (n=196). Coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring (Agatston method) vs. Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) stenosis severity was evaluated on Correlation with maximum coronary stenosis severity and diagnostic performance for significant CAD on CCTA (r=0.543, p=<0.001). Coronary artery calcium scoring correlated moderately with maximum stenosis severity (r=0.543, p<0.001), with CAC >=100 showing 100% specificity and 38.5% sensitivity for significant CAD.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: