Key result
Lipoprotein(a) levels do not differ between Kyrgyz and Slavic adults across age groups.
Why the study?
The study aimed to compare lipoprotein(a) concentrations between Kyrgyz and Slavic ethnic groups and to evaluate its sex-adjusted association with age.
Cross-Sectional (n=1,161)
Yes
In a population-based sample from the Kyrgyz Republic, median Lp(a) concentrations did not differ between Kyrgyz and Slavic ethnic groups, and showed only weak, sex- and ethnicity-heterogeneous positive associations with age.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No ethnic difference in Lp(a) concentrations observed; leaves open whether age-adjusted thresholds apply in Central Asian populations.
Objective: To perform a comparative analysis of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) concentration in Kyrgyz and Slavic ethnic groups and to assess its association with age, adjusted for sex. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 1161 residents of the Chui Region of the Kyrgyz Republic: 714 Kyrgyz and 447 Slavs. The mean age of participants was 41.2 (13.1) years; men accounted for 40.8% of the sample. Lp(a) concentration was measured using an ARCHITECT c4000 automated analyzer (Abbott). Because of the skewed distribution of Lp(a), data are presented as median and interquartile range. Between-group differences were assessed with the Mann–Whitney U test. The association of Lp(a) with age was examined using Spearman correlation analysis and linear regression analysis. Results: The median Lp(a) concentration in the total sample was 6.2 mg/dL; a level >30 mg/dL was found in 9.3% of participants. Lp(a) concentration did not differ significantly between Kyrgyz and Slavs: 6.2 (2.9; 12.7) vs 6.5 (2.9; 16.1) mg/dL, respectively (p=0.117). A positive but weak correlation of Lp(a) with age was found in Kyrgyz (r s =0.148; p=0.002) and Slavs (r s =0.173; p<0.001). Among Kyrgyz, the association persisted in both men (r s =0.138; p=0.015) and women (r s =0.105; p=0.035). In Slavs, the association was present in women (r s =0.227; p<0.001) but absent in men (r s =0.098; p=0.206). The linear regression coefficient in Slavic women was higher than in Kyrgyz women (0.285 vs 0.100 mg/dL per year; p=0.033). Conclusion: Lp(a) concentration did not differ between the ethnic groups studied. The observed age-related associations were weak and heterogeneous with respect to sex and ethnicity. The cross-sectional design does not allow these findings to be interpreted as an intra-individual increase in Lp(a) with age.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alioglu et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Lipoprotein(a) concentration and cardiovascular risk (n=1,161). Kyrgyz ethnicity (and age) vs. Slavic ethnicity was evaluated on Median lipoprotein(a) concentration (mg/dL) (r=0.148 for age correlation in pooled cohort; ΔB=0.115 mg/dL per year between ethnic groups, 95% CI -0.018 to 0.247, p=0.117). Lipoprotein(a) concentration did not differ between Kyrgyz and Slavic adults (median 6.2 vs 6.5 mg/dL, p=0.117), and showed only a weak positive correlation with age in both groups (r=0.148, p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: