This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
BACKGROUND: Hoover's sign is a commonly used clinical sign for diagnosing functional leg weakness, a feature of functional neurological disorder (FND). However, it relies on clinicians' qualitative assessment. Therefore, more reliable and objective assessment methods are needed. This study aims to develop a portable device and procedure for standardized quantitative measurement of Hoover's sign and validate its utility in healthy controls feigning leg weakness. METHODS: Healthy volunteers without medical backgrounds were recruited. A portable floor-based device with a pressure sensor placed under the heel of one foot was developed to measure hip extension strength during voluntary and involuntary movements. Subjects performed the test under three conditions: healthy, feigning mild weakness, and feigning severe weakness. The involuntary/voluntary ratio (IV/V ratio) and the side ratio (the IV/V ratio of the feigning leg compared to the non-feigning leg) were evaluated. RESULTS: Forty-two subjects were recruited. In the healthy state, the mean IV/V ratio was 0.60 ± 0.23 on the right side and 0.62 ± 0.24 on the left. The IV/V ratio was significantly higher in the feigned leg during both mild (1.26 ± 0.49) and severe (1.83 ± 0.70) feigning compared to the healthy state (p < 0.001 for both), while it was significantly lower in the non-feigned leg during mild (0.40 ± 0.22) and severe (0.32 ± 0.22) feigning (p < 0.001 for both). The side ratio also significantly increased during feigning. ROC analysis revealed optimal IV/V ratio cutoffs of 0.93 for distinguishing mild feigning (sensitivity: 77%, specificity: 93%), and 0.95 for severe feigning (sensitivity: 91%, specificity: 94%). CONCLUSIONS: This portable device can provide a standardized quantitative measure of Hoover's sign and may be useful in future studies of functional leg weakness, particularly in patients with comorbid conditions.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kanbayashi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: