Key result
Intravascular lithotripsy with stenting achieves 100% procedural success in severely calcified supra-aortic stenoses.
Why the study?
Heavily calcified carotid or vertebral artery lesions pose a challenge for stent placement and yield suboptimal results due to poor stent expansion, for which shockwave lithotripsy offers a potential solution to achieve luminal gain.
Is intravascular shockwave lithotripsy combined with percutaneous stenting feasible and safe for reducing stenosis in patients with heavily calcified extracranial carotid or vertebral artery lesions?
Cohort (n=41)
No
Is intravascular shockwave lithotripsy combined with percutaneous stenting feasible and safe for reducing stenosis in patients with heavily calcified extracranial carotid or vertebral artery lesions?
Demonstrates the technical feasibility and luminal gain of intravascular shockwave lithotripsy as an adjunct to transfemoral stenting in heavily calcified extracranial carotid and vertebral artery stenosis.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports procedural feasibility of lithotripsy-assisted carotid stenting; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Patients harboring heavily calcified concentric or eccentric type lesions in the carotid or vertebral artery pose a challenge in placing a stent to reduce the lesion. These lesions yield suboptimal results due to poor stent expansion. Shockwave lithotripsy offers a potential solution for achieving luminal gain. METHODS: We present a retrospective study of all patients at our institution who were treated with lithotripsy for extracranial carotid or vertebral artery stenosis associated with heavily calcified lesions from July 2022 to February 2026. Data were maintained in our procedural database and retrospectively analyzed for patients treated with lithotripsy. All consecutive patients were analyzed for demographic information, procedural data, perioperative complications, and 6-month midterm follow-up imaging for restenosis. RESULTS: A total of 41 patients (8 vertebral artery lesions and 33 carotid lesions) were treated with intravascular lithotripsy at our institution between July 2022 and February 2026. The mean age for the cohort was 70.7 ± 8.7. The mean lesion pretreatment for the carotid stenosis was 77 ± 13% and for the vertebral artery treated patients 81 ± 11%. All patients were successfully treated with stenting and lithotripsy, and the mean stenosis posttreatment was 15 ± 14% for the carotid stenosis and 8 ± 5% for the vertebral artery lesions. There were 2 groin complications (5%) with femoral artery pseudoaneurysms treated with thrombin injection and 1 perioperative stroke (3%) secondary to a dissection in the carotid stent cohort. CONCLUSIONS: The current study demonstrates the feasibility of lithotripsy for heavily calcified lesions treated with transfemoral stenting. Future prospective core laboratory adjudicated studies are warranted to determine the efficacy of this technique.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gutierrez et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Severe calcified extracranial carotid or vertebral artery stenosis (n=41). Intravascular shockwave lithotripsy and percutaneous stenting was evaluated on Procedural success and posttreatment residual stenosis. Intravascular lithotripsy with stenting achieved 100% procedural success, reducing mean carotid stenosis from 77% to 15% and vertebral stenosis from 81% to 8%, with a 3% stroke rate.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: