Key result
Higher CCHG index linked to ~30% higher risk of incident stroke per unit.
Why the study?
Systemic inflammation and insulin resistance are closely linked in cerebrovascular disease, yet no existing biomarker integrates an inflammatory marker with the cholesterol-high-density lipoprotein-glucose (CHG) index for stroke risk prediction.
Does the composite C-reactive protein and cholesterol–high-density lipoprotein–glucose (CCHG) index improve the prediction of incident stroke compared to the CHG and TyG indices in adults aged ≥ 45 years?
Cohort (n=6,804)
Yes
Does the composite C-reactive protein and cholesterol–high-density lipoprotein–glucose (CCHG) index improve the prediction of incident stroke compared to the CHG and TyG indices in adults aged ≥ 45 years?
An elevated CCHG index is significantly associated with an increased risk of incident stroke in a non-linear manner and offers modestly better discriminative ability than the CHG and TyG indices.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
CCHG may refine stroke risk stratification in older adults; extends TyG/CHG markers but leaves open clinical utility pending validation.
Background Systemic inflammation and insulin resistance (IR) are closely linked in cerebrovascular disease. Triglyceride–Glucose (TyG) index and cholesterol–high-density lipoprotein–glucose (CHG) index are proposed markers of IR. Yet no existing biomarker integrates an inflammatory marker with CHG index for stroke risk prediction. This study combined C-reactive protein (CRP) with CHG to create a novel composite index (CCHG) and sought to validate its predictive value for stroke. Methods In this cohort study, 6,804 adults aged ≥ 45 years were recruited from the CHARLS database, with data collected from 2011 to 2020. Stroke events were recorded during a median nine-year follow-up. The TyG, CHG, and CCHG indices were calculated, and their associations with stroke risk were evaluated using univariate and multivariate Cox regression models. Restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis was employed to investigate potential non-linear dose–response relationships. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to compare the predictive performance of the three indices, and subgroup analyses were conducted to assess their applicability across different populations. Results Among the 6,804 participants, 675 (9.9%) developed stroke during the nine-year follow-up. In unadjusted Cox regression models, the TyG index (HR = 1.37, 95% CI: 1.24–1.52, p < 0.001), the CHG index (HR = 1.64, 95% CI: 1.41–1.90, p < 0.001), and the CCHG index (HR = 1.52, 95% CI: 1.37–1.68, p < 0.001) were all significantly associated with stroke risk. After full multivariable adjustment (Model 3), the HR with 95% CI for incident stroke was 1.30 (1.15–1.47) for CCHG, 1.34 (1.10–1.62) for CHG, and 1.23 (1.09–1.39) for TyG. These associations persisted in the adjusted models. RCS analysis revealed a linear relationship between the TyG index and stroke risk, whereas the CHG and CCHG indices showed positive non-linear associations. ROC curve analysis demonstrated that the CCHG index had a modestly higher discriminative ability than the TyG and CHG indices in predictive performance. Subgroup analyses revealed no significant interactions for CHG or CCHG across subgroups ( p for interaction > 0.05). By contrast, an interaction was observed between the TyG index and hypertension ( p for interaction = 0.046). Conclusions An elevated CCHG index is significantly correlated with an increased risk of stroke, demonstrating a non-linear relationship. Furthermore, the CCHG index showed modestly better discriminative ability for incident stroke compared with CHG and TyG indices. Clinical trial number Not applicable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bai et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Stroke risk (n=6,804). C-reactive protein combined with cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein, and glucose (CCHG) index vs. Per 1-unit increment (and lowest quartile Q1 reference, along with CHG and TyG indices) was evaluated on Incident stroke (HR 1.30, 95% CI 1.15-1.47, p=<0.001). Each 1-unit increase in the CCHG index was independently associated with a 30% higher risk of incident stroke (adjusted HR 1.30, 95% CI 1.15-1.47, p < 0.001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: