Key result
Upadacitinib increased total cholesterol from 4.19 to 5.21 mmol/L over 2 years (P<.001) alongside resolving inflammation, without increasing the LDL-C/HDL-C ratio.
Why the study?
JAK inhibitors affect lipid metabolism, but longitudinal real-world data on lipid changes during upadacitinib therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease, and their relation to inflammatory activity, were scarce.
Does upadacitinib affect lipid profiles and what is their relationship with inflammatory activity in patients with inflammatory bowel disease over 2 years?
Cohort (n=159)
No
Does upadacitinib affect lipid profiles and what is their relationship with inflammatory activity in patients with inflammatory bowel disease over 2 years?
In patients with inflammatory bowel disease treated with upadacitinib for up to 2 years, total cholesterol, LDL-C, and HDL-C rose modestly in correlation with reduced inflammation without increasing the LDL-C/HDL-C ratio or causing major adverse cardiovascular events.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
TC changes with upadacitinib in IBD are hypothesis-generating; leaves open implications for monitoring and cardiovascular risk.
Background Upadacitinib (UPA), a selective Janus kinase 1 inhibitor, is approved for moderate-to-severe inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). JAK inhibitors affect lipid metabolism, but longitudinal real-world data on lipid changes during UPA therapy, and their relation to inflammatory activity, are scarce. Methods In this single-center retrospective cohort study, patients with ulcerative colitis or Crohn’s disease treated with upadacitinib were followed for up to 2 years. Serial fasting lipid profiles and inflammatory markers (fecal calprotectin, C-reactive protein [CRP], high-sensitivity CRP) were collected at baseline, end of induction (weeks 8-12), 1 year, and 2 years. Lipid trajectories were analyzed with linear mixed-effects models; paired changes were compared with paired t-tests. Results Among 159 patients (mean age 43.3 ± 14.0 years; 62.3% male), total cholesterol (TC) rose from 4.19 ± 0.87 mmol/L at baseline to 4.92, 5.03, and 5.21 mmol/L at the end of induction, 1 year, and 2 years (mixed-effects estimates +0.70 to +0.90; all P < .001). Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) rose in parallel, and the LDL-C/HDL-C ratio did not increase. CRP reductions correlated with lipid rises (Spearman rho = −0.45 to −0.47; all P ≤ .02). No cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke occurred (0/159); one venous thromboembolism and 3 hypertension cases were recorded. Conclusions In patients with IBD treated with UPA, TC and LDL-C rose modestly alongside the resolution of inflammation; HDL-C improved and the LDL-C/HDL-C ratio did not increase. Lipid monitoring and individualized cardiovascular risk assessment are warranted during UPA therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
He et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Inflammatory bowel disease (ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease) (n=159). Upadacitinib vs. Baseline (pre-treatment) was evaluated on Longitudinal changes in total cholesterol (TC) from baseline to 2 years (Mixed-effects estimates +0.70 to +0.90 mmol/L, p=<0.001). Upadacitinib increased total cholesterol from 4.19 to 5.21 mmol/L over 2 years (P<.001) alongside resolving inflammation, without increasing the LDL-C/HDL-C ratio.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: