Key result
Non-combustible nicotine disrupts autonomic and hemodynamic regulation, with ENDS exerting greater effects than NRT.
Why the study?
Nicotine exerts significant cardiovascular and autonomic effects through sympathetic nervous system stimulation, motivating a synthesis of evidence on the cardiovascular impact of non-combustible nicotine delivery routes.
Non-combustible nicotine delivery systems are not physiologically neutral for the cardiovascular system, with electronic nicotine delivery systems raising greater cardiovascular safety concerns than controlled nicotine replacement therapies.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Non-combustible nicotine may impair autonomic function; leaves open comparative long-term CV outcomes of ENDS versus NRT.
INTRODUCTION: Nicotine is a highly addictive alkaloid that exerts significant cardiovascular and autonomic effects through activation of nicotinic cholinergic receptors, leading predominantly to sympathetic nervous system stimulation. This review synthesizes evidence on the cardiovascular impact of nicotine delivered via non-combustible routes, including Nicotine Replacement Therapies (NRT) and Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS). METHODS: A narrative literature review was conducted using major biomedical databases, focusing on studies published between 2000 and 2025 that evaluated autonomic regulation, hemodynamic responses, and vascular effects associated with nicotine exposure. RESULTS: The evidence consistently shows that nicotine, independent of the route of administration, increases heart rate, alters blood pressure, reduces heart rate variability, and disrupts sympathovagal balance, key markers of cardiovascular risk. DISCUSSION: While NRT provides controlled and predictable nicotine dosing with a relatively stable hemodynamic profile and remains an effective smoking cessation strategy, it is not devoid of cardiovascular effects, particularly when combined with ongoing nicotine use. In contrast, ENDS are characterized by substantial variability in nicotine delivery, greater oxidative stress, and more pronounced autonomic responses, raising concerns about their cardiovascular safety. CONCLUSION: Nicotine cannot be considered physiologically neutral for the cardiovascular system, underscoring the importance of distinguishing therapeutic from recreational nicotine use and the need for continued critical evaluation of emerging nicotine delivery products.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vallejos et al. (2026) conducted a review in Nicotine exposure via non-combustible routes. Non-combustible nicotine (Nicotine Replacement Therapies and Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems) was evaluated on Autonomic regulation, hemodynamic responses, and vascular effects (heart rate, blood pressure, heart rate variability, sympathovagal balance). Non-combustible nicotine increases heart rate, alters blood pressure, reduces heart rate variability, and disrupts sympathovagal balance, with ENDS showing greater autonomic effects than NRT.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: