Key result
Percutaneous VA-ECMO decannulation yields ~82% success with no significant reduction in groin wound complications.
Why the study?
Femoral VA-ECMO decannulation is associated with significant morbidity, and published experience comparing percutaneous decannulation with surgical cutdown remains limited.
Does a fully percutaneous VA-ECMO decannulation strategy reduce procedural duration and groin wound complications compared with open surgical cutdown in patients weaning from VA-ECMO?
Cohort (n=56)
No
Does a fully percutaneous VA-ECMO decannulation strategy reduce procedural duration and groin wound complications compared with open surgical cutdown in patients weaning from VA-ECMO?
Percutaneous VA-ECMO decannulation using suture-mediated vascular closure devices is feasible with an 82% technical success rate and significantly reduces procedural time and groin wound complications when technically successful compared with open surgical cutdown.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support percutaneous VA-ECMO decannulation when successful; leaves open randomized confirmation before practice change.
Objective Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is an established therapy for severe cardiac failure, but femoral decannulation remains associated with significant morbidity. Percutaneous decannulation has emerged as an alternative to surgical cutdown; however, published experience remains limited. This study evaluates a fully percutaneous VA-ECMO decannulation strategy using the Abbott ProStyle vascular closure device compared with open surgical cutdown. Methods A retrospective single-centre matched cohort study identified all patients undergoing intended percutaneous VA-ECMO decannulation between November 2023 and January 2026 and matched them to a surgical cutdown cohort according to age and sex. Outcomes were assessed by intention-to-treat, with technically successful cases evaluated secondarily. Results Twenty-eight patients underwent intended percutaneous VA-ECMO decannulation. Technical success was achieved in 82% (n = 23), with five conversions to open cutdown. On intention-to-treat analysis, procedural duration was shorter (94.1 ± 26.3 vs 121.7 ± 46.9 minutes, p = .063) and groin wound complications were less frequent (7.1% vs 25.0%, p = .077), although neither reached statistical significance. Among technically successful percutaneous decannulations, procedural duration was significantly shorter (88.0 ± 28.7 vs 120.8 ± 50.0 minutes, p = .020) and groin wound complications significantly lower (4.3% vs 30.4%, p = .047). Survival to discharge was similar between groups (p = .78). Conclusion Percutaneous VA-ECMO decannulation achieved 82% technical success, with numerically shorter procedural duration and fewer groin wound complications on intention-to-treat analysis. Among technically successful cases, both outcomes were significantly improved compared with surgical cutdown.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miladinovic et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Severe cardiac failure requiring venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) weaning (n=56). Percutaneous VA-ECMO decannulation using vascular closure device vs. Open surgical cutdown was evaluated on Groin wound complications (intention-to-treat) (p=0.077). Percutaneous VA-ECMO decannulation achieved 82% technical success with numerically fewer groin wound complications vs surgical cutdown on intention-to-treat (7.1% vs 25.0%, p=0.077).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: