Key result
CS-MORT-6 score predicts in-hospital mortality at 24 hours with ~0.76 external discrimination.
Why the study?
The ordinal SCAI classification does not rank mortality risk within a stage in cardiogenic shock, and existing risk scores generally require imaging, procedural, or support-dependent data.
Does the 24-hour CS-MORT-6 score refine in-hospital mortality risk prediction within EHR-derived SCAI stages in adults with cardiogenic shock?
Cohort (n=4,150)
Yes
Does the 24-hour CS-MORT-6 score refine in-hospital mortality risk prediction within EHR-derived SCAI stages in adults with cardiogenic shock?
At 24 hours, the CS-MORT-6 score using six routine clinical and laboratory variables substantially refines in-hospital mortality risk stratification within EHR-derived SCAI cardiogenic shock stages with moderate external discrimination.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May refine 24-hour mortality stratification within SCAI stages using routine EHR data; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Background Cardiogenic shock carries high in-hospital mortality, and the ordinal SCAI classification does not rank risk within a stage. Existing scores generally require imaging, procedural, or support-dependent data. Methods We identified 3103 adults with documented cardiogenic shock in MIMIC-IV. Six predictors (lactate, urine output, cardiac arrest, age, blood urea nitrogen, red cell distribution width) were selected by bootstrap LASSO screening and clinical review. CS-MORT-6 was derived as two continuous ridge logistic models (lactate or anion gap) fitted at a 24-h landmark and a 0-to-15-point integer score. The primary outcome was subsequent in-hospital death among patients alive in the ICU at the landmark (n = 2694; 892 deaths). The models were externally validated in 1047 patients from 117 eICU hospitals. Results The integer score's AUROC was 0.727 (95% CI, 0.706-0.747) on cross-validation and 0.759 (0.729-0.790) externally; corresponding values were 0.734 and 0.759 (lactate model) and 0.726 and 0.748 (anion-gap model). Externally, the integer score over-predicted on average (calibration-in-the-large -0.22, slope 1.15). Within EHR-derived SCAI stages, mortality differed by 20 to 47 percentage points between the lowest and highest score tertiles in MIMIC-IV, with a similar pattern in eICU. Adding the anion-gap model to stage increased apparent AUROC by 0.139 (0.116-0.162) in MIMIC-IV and 0.141 (0.101-0.178) in eICU. Compared with BOS,MA2 (654 eICU patients scorable by both), the anion-gap model's AUROC difference was 0.004 (-0.039 to 0.046). Conclusions At 24 h, CS-MORT-6 distinguished mortality risk within EHR-derived SCAI stages and retained moderate discrimination externally. Repeated scoring and real-time performance require prospective evaluation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Otabor et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Cardiogenic shock (n=4,150). CS-MORT-6 mortality score (incorporating lactate or anion gap, urine output, cardiac arrest, age, BUN, and RDW at 24 h) vs. EHR-derived SCAI stage alone and BOS,MA2 score was evaluated on Subsequent in-hospital death among patients alive in the ICU at the 24-hour landmark (AUROC 0.727 (internal); AUROC 0.759 (external), 95% CI 0.706-0.747). The CS-MORT-6 integer score discriminated subsequent in-hospital mortality at 24 h with an AUROC of 0.727 (95% CI 0.706-0.747) internally and 0.759 (95% CI 0.729-0.790) externally.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: