Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
General Background: Corporate performance is a key issue in corporate governance research as it reflects a company’s ability to create value and maintain competitiveness. Specific Background: Governance mechanisms, including audit committees and board characteristics such as the gender and age of directors, are considered important in shaping corporate performance, whilst intellectual capital is increasingly viewed as a strategic resource for value creation. Knowledge Gap: Previous research has largely examined governance and intellectual capital variables in isolation, with limited evidence regarding the integration of these variables within a single model and the testing of the moderating role of intellectual capital. Objectives: This study examines the influence of the audit committee, directors’ gender and directors’ age on firm performance and tests whether intellectual capital acts as a moderator in these relationships. Method: Using a quantitative approach, this study analyses secondary data from 32 manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange over the period 2021–2024 using PLS-SEM with SmartPLS 4 software. Results: Directors’ gender and intellectual capital have a positive and significant effect on firm performance, whilst the audit committee, directors’ age, and all interaction terms are not significant. Novelty: This study integrates various governance and intellectual capital variables within a single framework. Implications: Firms should strengthen gender diversity and intellectual capital to improve performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Manurung et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: