Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In noisy physical reservoirs, the classical information-processing capacity Cᵢₚ quantifies how well a linear readout can realize tasks measurable from the input history, yet Cᵢₚ can be far smaller than the observed rank of the readout covariance. We explain this ``missing capacity'' by introducing the innovation capacity Cᵢ, the total capacity allocated to readout components orthogonal to the input filtration (Doob innovations, including input-noise mixing). Using a basis-free Hilbert-space formulation of the predictable/innovation decomposition, we prove the conservation law Cᵢₚ+Cᵢ=rank(ΣXX)≤ d, so predictable and innovation capacities exactly partition the rank of the observable readout dimension covariance ΣXX∈ Rd× d. In linear-Gaussian Johnson-Nyquist regimes, ΣXX(T)=S+T N₀, the split becomes a generalized-eigenvalue shrinkage rule and gives an explicit monotone tradeoff between temperature and predictable capacity. Geometrically, in whitened coordinates the predictable and innovation components correspond to complementary covariance ellipsoids, making Cᵢ a trace-controlled innovation budget. A large Cᵢ forces a high-dimensional innovation subspace with a variance floor and under mild mixing and anti-concentration assumptions this yields extensive innovation-block differential entropy and exponentially many distinguishable histories. Finally, we give an information-theoretic lower bound showing that learning the induced innovation-block law in total variation requires a number of samples that scales with the effective innovation dimension, supporting the generative utility of noisy physical reservoirs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anthony Polloreno (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: