Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study examined whether training with phonologically similar, high–neighborhood-density word cohorts promotes expressive phonological gains in a 4-year-old bidialectal Cypriot-Greek–speaking child with a consistent phonological disorder. Using a single-case design with baseline, intervention, post-test, and 1-month follow-up phases, the child received sixteen 45-minute intervention sessions delivered twice weekly over 2 months. Stimuli consisted of phonologically similar, high-density word cohorts, and all outcomes were scored by a second speech-language pathologist blinded to phase and target selection. Expressive phonology was assessed using a 49-item picture-naming probe, and maintenance/generalization was evaluated with an additional 20 untreated items at follow-up. Dependent measures included Proportion of Consonants Correct, Whole-Word Matches, Phonetic Inventory Size, and phonological processes, while the Intelligibility in Context Scale was completed by the child's teacher at baseline and follow-up. The results showed clear improvements from pre- to post-test across all measures, with gains maintained and generalized to untreated items at follow-up, accompanied by improved Intelligibility in Context Scale ratings. These findings suggest that implementing phonologically similar, high-density cohorts within a structured intervention can yield clinically meaningful and lasting improvements in expressive phonology and functional intelligibility in Cypriot-Greek, offering preliminary cross-linguistic support for neighborhood-density–informed target selection in speech sound disorder intervention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Filippou et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: