Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reliable assessment of hydrothermal lignocellulosic biomass conversion requires quantitative prediction of how feedstock mass, chemical energy, and carbon partition among bio-oil, solid residues, aqueous products, and gases under heterogeneous feedstock, solvent, catalyst, and severity conditions. We constructed a harmonized database of 3,693 HTL/HTC experiments from 187 scientific papers and 433 different biomass samples, with temperatures up to ∼ 600 ◦C and maximum residence times of up to 1,200 min. From this literature-scale dataset, we developed an uncertainty-aware machine-learning framework for predicting mass partitioning, energy and carbon allocation, and higher heating value (HHV) of condensed phases. Among the tree-ensemble regression methods examined, Random Forest (RF) provided the most stable cross-target compromise, with test R2 values for product yields around 0.8, energy/carbon allocation metrics between 0.8 and 0.9, and bio-oil HHV around 0.7 with root-mean-squared error ∼ 2–3 MJkg−1. The model recovers established severity, solvent, and composition trends while identifying regions where predictions are well supported or weakly constrained. SHAP attributions are interpreted as model-conditional associations: liquid-phase outcomes depend strongly on solvent and operating conditions, whereas solid-phase HHVs are more associated with feedstock carbon and ash content. Ensemble and conformal uncertainty methods distinguish relative epistemic uncertainty from calibrated scenario bounds. The framework is intended for uncertainty-aware process screening, scenario bounding, and experimental prioritization rather than unqualified point optimization in poorly represented regimes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elfetni et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: