Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose Our study aims to retrospectively investigate injury-related specialized health care utilization and costs among primary health care patients participating in a multifactorial falls prevention programme (MFFP) compared with sex-, age-, and residence-matched population-based controls. Methods This is a Finnish single-centre observational, retrospective, register-based controlled cohort study including 527 community-dwelling primary health care MFFP patients and their 3:1 age-, sex-, and residence-matched population-based controls (n = 1581), who had not participated in the MFFP. Patients’ injury-related specialized health care utilization was followed from their first MFFP visit until death or the end of December 2019. Results MFFP patients had more injury-related outpatient visits [IRR 1.76 (95% CI 1.63 to 1.91)] and hospitalizations [IRR 1.88 (95% CI 1.76 to 2.01)] than the controls. Among those with injury-related specialized health care utilization, the costs per person-year were not significantly higher than in controls for outpatient visits [mean ratio 1.06 (95% CI 0.71 to 1.58)], hospitalizations [mean ratio 1.03 (95% CI 0.68 to 1.56)], or total costs [mean ratio 1.11 (95% CI 0.74 to 1.67)]. MFFP patients did not accumulate higher total specialized health care costs than their controls. Conclusion MFFP patients had more injury-related specialized health care utilization than matched controls, but the total injury-related costs were similar between groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Korpi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: