Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Modern computer vision is increasingly driven by the search for representations that generalize across tasks, modalities, and learning settings, rather than excelling at a single benchmark. This has produced a broad collection of architectures and paradigms, including convolutional neural networks (CNNs), Vision Transformers (ViTs), foundation models, and diffusion-based generative models. Despite differing in design and training objectives, these approaches increasingly draw on a common set of principles: representation learning, self-attention, self-supervision, multimodal alignment, and generative modeling. As a result, the boundaries between discriminative, multimodal, and generative paradigms are becoming progressively less distinct. This survey examines that convergence through the lens of representation learning. We first introduce a common mathematical framework for describing vision architectures and learning paradigms across settings, then trace the evolution from CNNs and Vision Transformers, through hybrid CNN-Transformer architectures, foundation models, and multimodal vision-language systems, to recent generative approaches, including diffusion models, Diffusion Transformers, and Rectified Flows. By analyzing these paradigms within a single framework, we show how discriminative, multimodal, and generative learning are converging around shared representational principles, argue for a unified representation-learning perspective on modern computer vision, and outline open challenges and future directions toward general-purpose visual intelligence, multimodal foundation models, and trustworthy deployment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moujahid et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: