Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We investigate whether an artificial annular pinning landscape can control the transition from a single-vortex state to an L = 2 giant vortex in a mesoscopic type-II superconducting cylinder. The problem is formulated within the axisymmetric Ginzburg–Landau framework, with the strength, radius, and width of a Gaussian suppression of the linear Ginzburg–Landau coefficient treated as inverse-design variables. Candidate profiles are screened variationally and then validated by solving the full radial boundary-value problem and comparing Gibbs-energy branches. For a homogeneous cylinder, the L = 1 to L = 2 transition occurs at H1→2 = 0.485411 Hc2. The optimized annular profile, defined by V0 = 1.20, rp = 1.90 ξT, and σ = 0.36 ξT, shifts the transition to H1→2 = 0.383876 Hc2, a reduction of 20.92%, while retaining a comparable L = 2 stability interval. At He/Hc2 = 0.434644, the homogeneous cylinder remains in the L = 1 state, whereas the annularly pinned cylinder is stable in the L = 2 state. A fixed-field two-dimensional pseudo-time-dependent Ginzburg–Landau relaxation benchmark further shows that the optimized annulus produces the smallest L = 2 energy penalty among the tested homogeneous, central-defect, uniform-suppression, and off-axis-defect controls. These results identify annular suppression as a symmetry-preserving route for tuning discrete vortex-state transitions in confined superconductors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Prasetya et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: