Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Quadratic f ( R ) gravity carries a massive scalar degree of freedom, the scalaron, whose finite range λ λ screens its influence on the geometry outside a compact object. We show that this screening severs the exterior of a black hole from that of a neutron star of the same mass. The correction to the Schwarzschild metric is Yukawa-suppressed, falling as e-r/λ e - r / λ instead of polynomially in the coupling, and is therefore invisible to any expansion in powers of that coupling; the exterior is moreover intrinsically isotropic, so that inverting the temporal potential alone, as one does for single-potential solutions, fails to solve the field equations. Applying the Gibbons–Werner Gauss–Bonnet theorem to this geometry, we find the leading deflection angle to be exactly the general-relativistic 4 GM / b , with b the impact parameter, the scalaron contributions cancelling identically in the combination that bends light. The first correction carries the unfamiliar signature λ -1/2b-3/2e-b/λ λ - 1 / 2 b - 3 / 2 e - b / λ , screened beyond the scalaron range and confirmed against direct quadrature to around $$20%$$ 20 % at b=4λ b = 4 λ , improving to $$7%$$ 7 % at b=12λ b = 12 λ . What survives is not a difference of degree but of kind. The ingredients that deliver it — namely, non-analyticity in the coupling, the intrinsically isotropic gauge, the closed-form screened correction and the pressure-weighted scalar charge — are obtained within a single, self-consistent derivation here. A static black hole carries no scalar hair, and lenses precisely as general relativity requires; a neutron star acquires a scalar charge weighted by the pressure supporting it against collapse, and does not. Weak lensing therefore closes as a discriminant of the theory, whilst the horizon, as against a material surface, remains one in principle. The observational advantage lies not in bending angles at large impact parameter but in the strong-field imaging of the photon sphere, and in the stellar interior, where the scalar charge is fixed by the equation of state.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kumaran et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: