Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The hydrogen-abstraction reaction NH3 + Br → NH2 + HBr is strongly endothermic and has no measured rate coefficient. We report a full-dimensional analytical potential energy surface (PES) for it and variational transition-state theory (VTST) rate coefficients in both directions over 200 to 2000 K. CCSD(T)/CBS benchmarks, with a −3.51 kcal/mol spin–orbit correction on the reactant asymptote, place a very late saddle point 17.6 kcal/mol above the reactants but 2.1 kcal/mol below the NH2 + HBr asymptote once zero-point and spin–orbit corrections are included. A valence-bond/molecular-mechanics PES calibrated against that benchmark reproduces the stationary-point energies to 0.5 kcal/mol and the adiabatic barrier to 0.25 kcal/mol. The submerged barrier has two consequences. In the forward direction, it empties the ground-state tunneling window and makes the variational rate an upper bound, because flux is counted at energies from which products are inaccessible; quasi-classical trajectories on the same surface, once their zero-point leakage is removed, agree with the corrected variational rate within a factor of 3 over 1000 to 2000 K. In the reverse direction, a two-step treatment with long-range capture agrees with conventional transition-state theory above 400 K but falls by a factor of 3.4 below it at 200 K, and the activation energy is negative below 1000 K (−2.8 kcal/mol at 298 K), as measured for CH3 + HBr. The rate coefficients are predictions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cipriano Rángel (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: