Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Natural-language access to structured manufacturing data could let plant personnel query batch records without structured query language (SQL) expertise, yet realistic multi-table industrial schemas remain hard for text-to-SQL systems, and regulated environments demand data sovereignty, traceability, and validatable behavior that cloud-hosted models cannot satisfy. This study presents a locally deployable large language model (LLM) system that translates questions into SQL over an ISA-88-aligned database built from a pharmaceutical tablet dataset of 1005 batches. The pipeline combines schema-aware prompting, retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) over validated query examples, execution-based checking, confidence scoring, and human review. Evaluation on 48 questions across three complexity tiers compared a schema-only baseline with five enhancements: controlled vocabularies, retrieved examples, analytical views, execution-guided self-consistency, and schema-specialized fine-tuning. Retrieved examples roughly doubled execution accuracy for two open-weight models, from 23–25% to 46–48%, without reducing accuracy on any question; gains concentrated the 15 two- and three-table join questions, reaching 80%. Fine-tuning a seven-billion-parameter code model on execution-validated synthetic queries raised its accuracy from 19% to 44%, and, combined with retrieval, it achieved the highest observed accuracy on the hardest tier. Results show that a lightweight, auditable, locally deployable pipeline can support regulated manufacturing analytics while flagging outputs that require human validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rabelo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: