Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reliable carbon price forecasts support market monitoring, policy assessment, and operational planning in smart energy systems. Yet carbon prices are volatile, non-stationary, and driven by interacting regulatory, energy, commodity, and financial conditions. This study proposes an integrated Decomposition-Representation-Integration (DRI) framework that combines complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition with adaptive noise (CEEMDAN), a lightweight decoder-only causal Transformer, and XGBoost regression. CEEMDAN separates multi-scale dynamics; causal masked self-attention jointly reconstructs cross-scale dependencies without access to future observations; and XGBoost integrates the learned representation with exogenous drivers. The framework is evaluated using a strictly causal five-fold walk-forward protocol in which preprocessing, decomposition, validation, tuning, and model fitting are confined to each training window. Its CEEMDAN-CausalTransformer-XGBoost implementation achieves a minimum MAE of 0.6583, RMSE of 0.8071, and out-of-sample 𝑅 2 of 0.7470. It consistently outperforms decomposition-only and standalone benchmarks across five tuning strategies, while Diebold-Mariano tests provide statistical evidence of improved predictive accuracy over key baselines. Prediction-path analysis suggests that gains are more visible during high-volatility periods. These results indicate that reconstructing cross-scale information improves carbon-market monitoring and provides decision support for smart energy system operators, market participants, and policymakers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mutian et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: