Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background ‘Smart vapes’ are e-cigarettes with digital screens that provide device use information and enable autonomous computing and data exchange. This study measures the association between use of e-cigarettes with smart vape features and nicotine dependence among young people. Methods Data came from a convenience sample survey (N=4719) of respondents aged 15–25 who reported current (past 30-day) e-cigarette use (July–September 2024). Multivariable regression models assessed whether current use of devices containing specific smart vape features was associated with frequency of e-cigarette use and Nicotine Dependence Scale (NDS) scores, adjusting for demographics, financial situation, other tobacco use and downloading a smart vape app. Results Over half (59.1%) reported current smart vape use. Use of devices with specific features was associated with higher odds of more frequent e-cigarette use, compared with use of e-cigarettes without these features: notifications (low battery OR: 1.83, p<0.001; fully charged OR: 1.51, p<0.001; low e-liquid level OR: 1.67, p<0.001); status indicators (battery level OR: 2.76, p<0.001; e-liquid level OR: 3.12, p<0.001; puff count OR: 1.85, p<0.001); and customisation options (nicotine level OR: 2.19, p<0.001; flavour level OR: 1.79, p<0.001; and coil temperature controls OR: 1.33, p=0.003). Positive associations were similarly observed for the aforementioned features and NDS scores, with the exception of no significant relationship for e-liquid level indicator (β=0.03, p=0.481) and coil temperature controls (β=0.03, p=0.590) and with the addition of use of a device with proximity notifications (β=0.26, p<0.001) and video games (β=0.14, p=0.014). Conclusions Youth and young adults who use devices with smart vape features are more likely to report frequent e-cigarette use and higher nicotine dependence. These findings inform regulatory restrictions of smart vape designs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kreslake et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: