Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
How do non-ordained female ritual specialists gain legitimacy when formal institutions fail to resolve moral uncertainty? Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork conducted in Northeastern Thailand between January 2024 and March 2025, this study examines how a Mae Mor transforms everyday uncertainties into recognized ritual authority. Data were collected through 40 field visits, repeated interviews with the Mae Mor, 36 client interviews, ritual observations, shadowing, consultations, and digital follow-ups. The findings reveal a three-stage process termed uncertainty conversion. First, concerns about livelihoods, debt, illness, migration, relationships, and local conflicts are reinterpreted through karmic blockages, merit deficits, spiritual influences, and temporal misalignment. Second, these interpretations are translated into actionable ritual prescriptions, including merit-making, offerings, vows, protective rituals, spirit negotiations, and auspicious timing. Third, return visits, referrals, testimonials, and private digital exchanges reinforce perceptions of ritual efficacy and sustain the Mae Mor’s authority. The study argues that ritual legitimacy emerges not simply from institutional status or personal charisma but from the socially recognized capacity to convert uncertainty into cosmological explanations and practical interventions. This framework extends debates on symbolic power, ritual authority, and religious mediation beyond formally ordained institutions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: