Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Deceased-donor organ recovery is a high-stakes procedure often performed by fellows with limited structured training. No standardized curriculum currently exists in North America. To address this gap, we developed an organ-recovery course and assessed its effect on participants’ confidence and knowledge. Methods: This 2-day course, delivered by international experts in transplantation and donation, combined didactic lectures with cadaveric training. We used pre- and postcourse surveys to assess exposure, confidence, and knowledge. We compared responses using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. We summarized quantitative feedback descriptively and performed thematic analysis on qualitative responses. Results: A total of 20 participants attended the course. Nearly half of participants (47%) reported minimal prior exposure (< 5 cases). After the workshop, participants’ confidence significantly improved (median score 3.0, interquartile range [IQR] 2.0 to 4.0, to median score 6.0, IQR 4.0 to 7.0; p < 0.001). We observed the greatest gains in evaluating and declining suboptimal organs (median score 2.7, IQR 1.0 to 6.5, to median score 6.0, IQR 3.8 to 7.3; p < 0.001), with pancreas recovery showing the largest procedure-specific increase (median score 1.9, IQR 1.1 to 6.2, to median score 6.2, IQR 3.3 to 7.7). Of participants, 84% reported acquiring new knowledge, and 79% felt safer applying skills clinically. Conclusion: A structured, hands-on course significantly improved preparedness for organ recovery. Its reproducible design highlights the potential for widespread adoption and standardization of recovery practices across North America.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Patel et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: