Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Despite the rapidly evolving landscape, allogeneic transplant still plays a role in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Relapse post-transplant is not uncommon, leading to dismal prognosis. Donor lymphocyte infusions efficacy in this setting remains controversial. In this retrospective study, we report the use of DLIs in a cohort of 43 ALL (30 B- 13 T-) patients, treated at our Center between 2012 and 2024. 2y-OS, EFS and GRFS were 69.7% (57–85), 44.2% (31–63) and 34.9% (23–52). DLIs were administered in 16 patients. Indication were molecular relapse (44%), hematological relapse (37%) and mixed chimerism (19%). Patients received a median of 4 infusions (1–12), with the first being at a median of 218d (50-1076) post-transplant; median dose was 5.20 × 10 6 CD3+/kg (0.5–50). After DLIs, 2y-OS, EFS and GRFS were 68.8% (49–96), 41.2% (23–75) and 31.2% (15–65), respectively. 2y cumulative incidence of relapse post-DLI was 56.2%. Reasons for not administering DLI in other relapsed patients ( n = 9) were prior GvHD, logistical issues and rapid progression. Outcome was dismal for these patients with 2y-OS of 29.6% (10–87). Overall, our findings suggest that DLIs may retain a role in ALL, particularly when administered in the context of minimal disease burden and when integrated with emerging therapeutic approaches.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Serpenti et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: