Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
While EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are widely used as first-line treatment in advanced EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), acquired resistance leads to inevitable disease progression. Recent trials have evaluated adding chemotherapy to EGFR-TKIs, with inconsistent results and unclear clinical implications. We performed an updated meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of this combination and inform treatment selection. A systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO, CRD420251206930) of clinical trials were conducted. Eligible studies enrolled patients with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC and compared first-line EGFR-TKI therapy with or without chemotherapy. We searched EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, MEDLINE, and Scopus from inception to Nov 7, 2025. The primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), expressed as pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Fixed- or random-effect models were applied according to between-study heterogeneity, with random-effect sensitivity analyses performed for the primary outcomes. Ten eligible studies involving 2162 patients (combination therapy: 1108 patients; monotherapy: 1054 patients) were included. The pooled effects showed that combination therapy achieved a better PFS (HR = 0.58; 95%CI: [0.52, 0.65]; P < 0.01) and OS (HR = 0.73; 95%CI: [0.65, 0.82]; P < 0.01) than monotherapy. Patients receiving combination therapy also achieved a higher objective response rate (ORR) (OR = 1.77; 95%CI: [1.44, 2.17]; P < 0.01). These efficacy gains were accompanied by an increased risk of grade ≥ 3 adverse events (OR = 3.73; 95%CI: [2.52, 5.53]; P < 0.01), although no significant difference in treatment-related mortality was observed (OR = 2.33; 95%CI: [0.77, 7.03]; P = 0.13). First-line EGFR-TKI plus chemotherapy was associated with improved survival and tumor response but increased toxicity compared with EGFR-TKI monotherapy. Given the predominance of first-generation EGFR-TKI data, these findings support individualized benefit–risk assessment rather than a universal preference for combination therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: