Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study reports the development and systematic characterization of a magnetized kaolin–sheep wool composite adsorbent engineered from locally available raw kaolin and waste sheep wool composite was characterized using FTIR, SEM, and XRD analyses, demonstrating successful integration of functional groups, a heterogeneous surface morphology, and a stable structural matrix highly favorable for metal binding. Batch adsorption experiments were conducted to evaluate the effects of contact time, adsorbent dosage, temperature, pH, initial \(\:Cr(VI)\) concentration, and particle size on removal efficiency. Under optimized experimental conditions of \(\:2.5 g/L\) adsorbent dosage, \(\:{20}∘\:C\) , \(\:pH\:2\) , \(\:210 min\) contact time, and a \(\:63\:μ\:m\) particle size, a maximum \(\:Cr(VI)\) removal efficiency of 99.97% was achieved. Equilibrium studies revealed a maximum adsorption capacity ( \(\:{q}ₘₐₓ\) ) of 2.48 mg/g, which was achieved at an initial \(\:Cr(VI)\) adsorbate concentration of 10 mg/L. The adsorption equilibrium data were best described by the Freundlich isotherm model ( \(\:{R}²=0.961\) ), indicating multilayer adsorption on a heterogeneous surface, while the kinetic data adhered to the pseudo-second-order model ( \(\:{R}²=0.999\) ), signifying chemisorption as the rate-limiting mechanism. Thermodynamic parameters confirmed that the adsorption process was spontaneous and exothermic ( \(\:{Δ\:}{H}∘\:=-37.82\:kJ/mol\) ). These results demonstrate serves as an outstanding and environmentally sustainable adsorbent.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Birhanu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: