Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this paper, we construct a dataset consisting of paired diffuser-plate images and thickness-distribution images, and evaluate the computational cost and prediction accuracy of an image-to-image translation surrogate model that directly pre-dicts thickness-distribution images from diffuser-plate drawings. In conventional fluid simulation, computing thickness-distribution images from diffuser-plate drawings entails a substantial computational cost. The proposed image-to-image translation surrogate model significantly reduces the computational cost of predicting thickness-distribution images by employing a deep learning-based image-to-image translation method, compared with fluid simulation. Experimental results showed that predicting a single thickness-distribution image required an average of 3.3 hours with fluid simulation, whereas the proposed image-to-image translation surrogate model required an average of 122.0 milliseconds. In the image-to-image translation surrogate model, experimental results confirmed that Pix2Pix, which is one of the image-to-image translation techniques, achieved smaller errors relative to fluid simulation than the other evaluated methods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
YAMAGUCHI et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: