Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Water, sanitation, and solid waste management are intertwined urban services with clear physical interactions throughout their service chains. Despite synergies to maximise positive interlinkages and minimise negative interactions, few systematic planning frameworks integrate these three service chains during planning. While existing sectoral frameworks emphasise integration, no procedural framework guides an integrated approach to planning water, sanitation, and solid waste management into a coordinated, financially viable, modular service delivery plan. The proposed Integrated Planning Framework (IPF) encompass five stages: (1) an enabling environment assessment; (2) an integrated baseline assessment; (3) road-mapping and solution profiling; (4) modular and coordinated planning; and (5) implementation and adaptive management. It aligns key actors, manages interlinkages across services, co-develops a roadmap with community buy-in, and was tested and validated in two Ugandan towns. Lessons include the need for political-economy change, pragmatic sequenced action, and municipal leadership.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sakaya et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: