Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose: This study examines accountability, transparency, and community participation in financial management at BUMDes Tunggul Mandiri, Pekon Tunggul Pawenang, Indonesia.Research Methodology: This quantitative case study analyzes Likert-scale questionnaires from 46 managers, village officials, and community representatives. Multiple linear regression was conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics 25.Results: Accountability (β = 0.461, p < 0.001), transparency (β = 0.249, p = 0.032), and community participation (β = 0.299, p = 0.012) have positive significant associations with financial management. The joint test gives F(3, 42) = 14.902, p < 0.001; R² = 0.516 and adjusted R² = 0.481.Conclusions: The findings are consistent with stewardship mechanisms of answerability, informed trust, and alignment with community priorities. They do not establish causality or statistically proven coefficient dominance.Limitations: The single-enterprise design, stakeholder self-reports, overlapping measurement dimensions, and inconsistent role classifications limit interpretation and generalization.Contributions: The study extends stewardship-informed analysis to a BUMDes with commercial and social responsibilities, comparing three governance principles within one stakeholder setting. Practical implications include regular reconciliations, accessible reporting, and documented follow-up to community concerns, subject to further evaluation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rohmawati et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: