Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: This study demonstrates the use of a locally hosted, offline artificial intelligence approach to identify, quantify, and describe housing-related needs documented in routine case notes from a statewide cancer support service. METHODS: In this retrospective, exploratory service evaluation, a locally hosted, offline large language model screened 25,031 staff-generated case notes recorded between December 2020 and December 2025 for housing-related interactions and grouped confirmed interactions into categories based on a predefined framework. Flagged records and categorisation were independently verified by at least two reviewers, and confirmed interactions were summarised descriptively. RESULTS: Of 25,031 interactions, 308 (1.23%) were confirmed as housing-related interactions. The most prominent categorisations were lack of support from health and social services (44.16%), financial barriers to housing stability (37.66%), and homelessness or reliance on emergency or crisis housing (36.04%). In more than half of confirmed interactions, housing was not the initial reason for contact and emerged only during discussion. CONCLUSIONS: Findings highlight the utility of a privacy-preserving artificial intelligence approach to identify, quantify, and describe community needs at the intersection of housing and cancer care within large-scale, routinely collected service data. Although drawn from a single service, the findings align with existing evidence supporting coordinated pathways linking oncology, social, and housing services, and greater policy recognition of housing within cancer care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baldock et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: