Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article addresses the question of whether the rationality of public communication is a necessary condition for it to fulfill legitimizing functions. This condition is increasingly questioned in light of society’s obviously “untranscendable” social and cultural diversity. In response, the article proposes a concept of deliberative pluralism aimed at realizing deliberative democracy as the exercise of “communicative power” (in the Habermasian sense) by citizens in a liberal democracy. Here, the legitimizing “force” of the rationality of public communication is related not so much to the possibilities for consensus-building as to the struggle against manipulations of public communication.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Plamen Makariev (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: