Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Conductance-based water-cut measurements are sensitive to coupled changes in temperature and salinity. This study develops a Bayesian-regularized backpropagation neural network (BR-BPNN) for compensation using the mean sensor peak voltage, temperature, and salinity as inputs. A grid of 198 measured calibration points was used to construct a trilinear response surface and generate 9000 derived samples for developing BR-BPNN, a ridge-regularized nonlinear basis-expansion baseline (MPR), and support vector regression (SVR). On 40 independently measured test conditions spanning 55–95% nominal water cut, the fitted BR-BPNN achieved a mean absolute error of 1.72 percentage points, compared with 3.52 for MPR and 2.32 for SVR under the reported model-selection procedures. Training-strategy comparisons and physical-plane holdouts further assessed interpolation-based training. The selected 3-10-5-1 network was deployed on an STM32L496RGT3 and evaluated with newly acquired sensor inputs under the same 40 nominal conditions. Embedded evaluation achieved a mean absolute error of 1.868 percentage points and a mean network forward-inference time of 52.05 μs. The results demonstrate a compact implementation of coupled compensation for embedded conductance-based water-cut measurement within the tested laboratory domain.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: