Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reading engagement during adolescence is strongly associated with long-term academic and emotional outcomes, yet recent large-scale evidence shows a persistent decline in teenagers’ reading motivation and proficiency. Although personalized recommender systems offer a promising educational technology, most existing book recommenders rely on behavioral logs or demographic assumptions, which are often sparse, biased, and difficult to deploy in privacy-sensitive environments such as schools and libraries. We propose a personalized, emotion-aware book recommendation framework that models adolescents’ individualized preferences using lightweight and interpretable emotional representations derived from publicly available book descriptions. Leveraging the NRC Emotion Intensity Lexicon (NRC-EIL), we embed users and books in a shared affective space and construct personalized target emotion vectors from previously preferred books. We evaluate three ranking strategies: (i) similarity-based retrieval in the emotion space, (ii) a hybrid method that conditions large language model (LLM) ranking on structured emotion vectors, and (iii) an LLM-only baseline without explicit affective modeling. Experiments on the Book-Crossing dataset demonstrate that incorporating structured emotional signals consistently improves ranking effectiveness across P@K, MRR, and NDCG metrics, with statistically significant gains validated using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Results further show robustness under cold-start and sparse-interaction settings while maintaining interpretability and avoiding reliance on sensitive user attributes. These findings establish emotion-aware retrieval as a principled and scalable direction for advancing personalized recommendation and supporting sustained teenage reading engagement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cate et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: