Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Large compound libraries are reduced to candidate’s worth testing by computational prediction of drug-target interactions (DTI). We investigate whether this effort is aided by variational quantum circuits appropriate for noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices. Our hybrid model uses classical networks to encode ECFP4 fingerprints and protein sequence descriptors, compresses them to eight rotation angles, and then processes them using a four-layer hardware-efficient circuit that is read out using local Pauli-Z expectations. Realistic noise models are used to simulate the circuits, and it is trained end-to-end using gradients that match the parameter-shift algorithm. The model achieved test AUROCs of 0.896, 0.892, 0.911, and 0.878 on Davis, KIBA, BindingDB, and BIOSNAP. These results outperform a kernel SVM and logistic regression, although they lag behind a graph network on three datasets, a deep network (0.915–0.927), and gradient-boosted trees. Removing entanglement had little effect on the performance of a parameter-matched classical head, and no low-data advantage emerged. Hardware tolerance was demonstrated by the circuit itself. Because ranking is invariant to uniform noise attenuation, local readout avoided barren plateaus, 256 shots were sufficient, and 1% two-qubit error cost only 0.0025 AUROC. Calibration was recovered by recalibrating the reading. Hardware training costs, not noise, are the binding restriction. For drug-screening decisions, these predictions provide an evidence-based ranking of candidate compound–target pairs for experimental follow-up. The comparison with classical methods indicates whether adding a quantum circuit is justified by the resulting predictive performance and computational cost.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anusha et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: