Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background/Objectives: Whether coordination-based training can develop group cohesion in youth sport, and how cohesion relates to peripheral oxytocin, is unclear. We examined cohesion and salivary oxytocin during a six-month coordination- and cohesion-oriented program in junior handball players. Methods: Sixty-four male players (12–14 years) from four clubs joined a prospective, non-randomized, within-club controlled study (not prospectively registered). In each club, one pre-existing training slot (eight players) formed the experimental group (EG; n = 32) and the other the control group (CG; n = 32). For 24 weeks (three sessions/week), EG replaced 20–25 min of technical–tactical work with coordination, cooperation, and interpersonal-synchrony exercises. The primary outcome was Youth Sport Environment Questionnaire (YSEQ) Task Cohesion. Results: In the baseline-adjusted, cluster-robust analysis, T1 Task Cohesion was 0.72 points higher in EG than CG (95% CI 0.22–1.23; p = 0.010); Social Cohesion differed similarly (adjusted difference 0.77 points; 95% CI 0.33–1.22; p = 0.003). The adjusted oxytocin difference was imprecise and non-significant (5.0 pg/mL; 95% CI −0.01 to 10.02; p = 0.050), and oxytocin change was unrelated to Task Cohesion change. Conclusions: The program was accompanied by a more favorable cohesion trajectory than time-matched standard training. Non-randomized allocation precludes causal conclusions; oxytocin findings remain exploratory.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boncuț et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: