Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ligand binding identified during screening does not necessarily translate into improved nanocarrier delivery. Here, we report a membrane-context screening strategy that uses BT-549 cell membrane-functionalized silica microspheres to identify peptide ligands with preserved nanodelivery activity. From a 7-mer combinatorial library, P1 (KFYVSGT) was selected as a membrane-enriched peptide candidate based on its preferential retention by the membrane-functionalized stationary phase relative to bare silica. After conjugation to PEG–PCL micelles, P1 preserved the nanocarrier’s size, charge, morphology, stability, and drug-loading capacity, yet markedly enhanced biological performance. P1-functionalized micelles increased BT-549 cellular uptake by approximately 5-fold and tumor accumulation by about 3-fold in a BT-549 xenograft model. When loaded with doxorubicin, P1 micelles restrained tumor expansion to 1.96-fold of the initial volume, compared with 4.83-fold for nontargeted micelles, with favorable preliminary systemic tolerance. Competitive uptake, energy depletion, peptide-affinity capture, inhibition, colocalization, and docking analyses suggest that P1 activity is associated with a Galectin-1-related membrane environment. This work establishes membrane-context screening as a practical route to function-preserving peptide ligands for targeted nanodelivery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: