Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to appraise the comparative efficacy and safety of appending programmed death-1 (PD-1) or PD-ligand 1 (PD-L1) checkpoint blockade to standard chemotherapy in cervical cancer, with prespecified analyses across both the full randomized cohort and the PD-L1-enriched subset. Materials and Methods: In accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines, a comprehensive electronic search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ProQuest up to September 2025, targeting phase III randomized trials that incorporated PD-1 or PD-L1 blockade into a chemotherapy backbone. Pooled effect estimates were derived using random-effects modeling, generating hazard ratios (HR) for survival endpoints and risk ratios (RR) for tumor response. Methodological rigor was gauged with the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool, while small-study effects were explored through DOI plots supplemented by the LFK index. Results: Five phase III randomized controlled trials comprising 3,302 patients were included. The addition of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors to chemotherapy significantly improved overall survival [HR: 0.66, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.60-0.73] and progression-free survival (HR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.60-0.78), with low heterogeneity I2=0%. Objective response rates was modestly increased (RR: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.02-1.26). Survival benefits were mainly driven by PD-1 inhibitors (pembrolizumab and cadonilimab), whereas PD-L1 inhibitors showed less consistent effects. Absolute survival gains within 24 months were modest. Immune-related endocrine events, particularly hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism, were more frequent, but severe toxicities (grade ≥3) were not significantly increased. Conclusion: PD-1-targeting immunochemotherapy prolongs survival in cervical cancer while maintaining acceptable tolerability, positioning it as a leading treatment option for eligible patients. Further biomarker-driven and head-to-head trials are needed to optimize treatment selection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wijayanto et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: