Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Poor graft function (PGF) is a life-threatening complication after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). CD34+-selected stem cell boost has shown promise; however, data in the haploidentical setting and after failure of thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) are limited. Patients who received purified CD34+ boost for refractory PGF after HSCT at two centers were retrospectively analyzed. Outcomes included overall response rate (ORR), graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and overall survival (OS). Among the 116 evaluable patients, 86.79% (103/116) received haploidentical transplants and 113 (97.4%) had received at least one platelet-stimulating agent, including TPO-RA and/or recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO). The ORR was 67.24% (CR 62.93%, PR 4.31%). The 180-day cumulative recovery rates of neutrophils, hemoglobin, and platelets were 56.7%, 57.1%, and 65.7%, respectively. Active infection at the time of CD34+-selected stem cell boost was the sole independent predictor of lower ORR (OR = 3.786, 95% CI: 1.584-9.048, P = 0.003). The incidence of grade III-IV acute GVHD was 9.48%, and that of moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD was 11.21%. The OS was 64.66%. Responders had a significantly better OS than nonresponders (81.65% vs. 11.67%, P < 0.001). In conclusion, CD34+-selected stem cell boost is safe and highly effective for refractory PGF after allo-HSCT, including in haploidentical recipients and those who have failed TPO-RAs. Active infection at infusion predicts a poor treatment response, and non-responders have a dismal prognosis, underscoring the need for alternative strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
He et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: