Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background/Objectives: Deep learning models for diabetic retinopathy (DR) usually report a severity grade, and their attention maps explain that grade rather than individual lesions. We aimed to detect microaneurysms, hemorrhages, hard exudates and soft exudates (cotton-wool spots) separately, each with an attention map trained to fall on that lesion. Methods: An EfficientNet-B4 and Transformer encoder, pretrained on severity grades, feeds four lesion queries that each return a score and an attention map; a localization loss trains each map toward its lesion mask. We trained it on DDR and TJDR, tested it on their test sets and on two external sets (IDRiD and e-ophtha), and compared it with a U-Net. Results: The mean areas under the curve (AUCs) were 0.93–0.94 for hemorrhages, 0.90–0.96 for hard exudates and 0.81–0.90 for soft exudates; microaneurysms reached 0.91–0.96, except on DDR (0.58). We analyze this drop in detail. Attention ranked lesion pixels above the rest of the retina with an AUC-Judd of 0.948–0.996. Without the localization loss, detection was slightly lower, and attention moved to regions outside the lesions that still raised the prediction. The model detected lesions better than U-Net (mean AUC of 0.876 against 0.853) and, unlike the latter, also learned from images that have labels but no masks: with masks on half of the training images, detection and AUC-Judd were nearly unchanged. Conclusions: Supervising each lesion’s attention with its own mask gives a per-lesion score and a map that falls on that lesion, without reducing detection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alghamdi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: