Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Field safflower harvesting is challenged by target-scale variation, occlusion, and random growth orientations, which can degrade visual perception and end-effector alignment. This study proposes a robotic visual-guidance framework integrating FAPB-Net segmentation, corolla–bud topology, and selective main-auxiliary dual-camera correction. Inclination is estimated from the fitted corolla ellipse, while in-plane orientation is obtained from the directed bud-to-corolla vector. Auxiliary inclination estimates are introduced only when three-dimensional target matching and angular consistency are satisfied. FAPB-Net achieved corolla and bud intersection over union (IOU) values of 90.28% and 70.85% at 28 FPS. On 138 synchronized dual-camera test pairs, inclination mean absolute error (MAE) decreased from 7.5° to 6.3°, while Acc@10°, defined as the proportion of estimates with absolute error below 10°, increased from 86.2% to 90.6%. In field tests with 515 targets, recognition/localization and end-effector arrival rates reached 95.92% and 94.95%, respectively. For 447 targets with complete reference measurements, inclination and orientation MAEs were 6.0° and 4.72°. Pose-guided harvesting achieved a mean harvesting completeness rate (HCR) of 94.63%, compared with 91.40% for position-only guidance. These results indicate the practical value of pose information for reliable safflower harvesting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: