Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study proposes a non-uniform meshing strategy for finite element (FE) discretization aimed at improving mechanical accuracy under controlled nodal budgets in structural analyses with localized field gradients. Unlike quasi-uniform meshing, the proposed approach uses a priori node placement based on the zeros of Chebyshev polynomials. Their natural clustering near the endpoints of [−1, 1] is mapped onto the physical domain to generate a non-uniform distribution by construction, without adaptive refinement or iterative remeshing. The main contribution therefore lies not in the Chebyshev points themselves, but in their use as a deterministic, solution-independent rule for placing the vertices of low-order FE meshes. Three meshing strategies are compared: quasi-uniform, graded, and Chebyshev-based meshes. The graded mesh deliberately concentrates nodes in predefined critical regions, whereas the Chebyshev-based mesh follows a predefined analytical placement rule. Performance is assessed against converged fine-mesh FE reference solutions using relative errors in displacement and von Mises stress, local and peak-stress errors, mesh-quality indicators, stiffness-matrix conditioning, and computational cost. For the two-hole plate at Ntot=2200 the relative displacement error decreases from 1.28×10−2 for the quasi-uniform mesh to 8.48×10−3 for the Chebyshev-based mesh, while the graded mesh reaches 7.75×10−3. Overall, the Chebyshev-based strategy improves displacement accuracy relative to quasi-uniform meshing in the investigated configurations, although the geometrically graded mesh generally achieves lower errors and improvements in stress accuracy are not systematic.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Es-sady et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: