Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The increasing deployment and decommissioning of wind turbines (WTs) generates growing end-of-life (EoL) wind turbine blade (WTB) material streams for which no single circular pathway is suitable. This structured narrative review applies an adapted R-strategy framework to systematically compare circular WTB management options from R9 Recover to R1/R2 Rethink/Reduce. Technical processes and implementation conditions are synthesized together with environmental, economic, technological, and regulatory evidence. The review shows that strategies preserving the original product or component, including reuse, repair/refurbishment, and repurposing, retain substantial structural and manufacturing value but depend strongly on WTB condition, geometry, logistics, and qualification requirements. Recycling provides scalable material-oriented pathways, although suitability differs markedly between glass fiber-reinforced polymers (GFRPs) and carbon fiber-reinforced polymers (CFRPs): mechanical recycling and co-processing remain particularly relevant for GFRPs, whereas thermal and chemical recovery offer greater potential for CFRPs. Environmental and economic performance therefore cannot be inferred solely from the R-hierarchy. Based on these findings, the review derives stakeholder-specific recommendations for industry, operators, policymakers, and research to support condition-based pathway selection, cascading R-strategies, standardized qualification, supportive legislation, and circular WTB design.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tschatschanidse et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: