Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Conventional fuze safety-and-arming (S&A) mechanisms often rely on setback or centrifugal forces, whereas electrically driven pin pullers and motor–lead-screw units may require relatively long axial travel. This study presents a printed circuit board (PCB)-stator axial-flux electromagnetic rotary actuator designed to switch between functional positions through 180° rotor rotation while retaining a potential reverse-drive path. The investigation focuses on the electromagnetic drive subsystem rather than the complete S&A mechanism. An electromechanical model was established using the voltage balance, back electromotive force, torque–current relation, rotor inertia, and equivalent resisting torque. A three-dimensional transient finite-element model was used to evaluate the effects of air gap and permanent-magnet thickness on 180° positioning time. The spatial magnetic-field distribution, friction-related resistance, and eddy-current losses were considered when interpreting the results. Within the investigated air-gap range of 0.5–1.1 mm, the shortest positioning time in the air-gap sweep was 45.0 ms at 1.1 mm. With this gap fixed, a magnet thickness of 1.2 mm yielded a finite-element positioning time of 42.6 ms, compared with 40.3 ms from the analytical model (a 5.40% difference relative to the finite-element result). A simplified prototype reached 180° in 35.8 ms at 5 A, compared with 33.98 ms from a simulation using the corresponding low-friction boundary conditions (a 5.08% difference relative to the measured time). These results support the drive model under the tested conditions; full-device locking, release, reverse recovery, and cyclic reliability remain to be verified.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: