Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
During symmetrical faults in photovoltaic (PV)-integrated distribution networks, induction motor (IM) deceleration elevates reactive-power demand and delays post-fault voltage recovery, whereas conventional voltage-driven support can withdraw prematurely upon initial voltage rebound. To resolve this mismatch, this paper proposes a coordinated transient voltage support (CTVS) strategy that explicitly incorporates IM electromechanical dynamics. A coupled differential-algebraic equation (DAE) model integrating third-order IM dynamics, distributed PV (DPV) DC-link dynamics, and network power balance is formulated, from which a trajectory-local closed-loop Q–V sensitivity is derived to characterize location-dependent support effectiveness. The CTVS controller coordinates critical-bus voltage magnitude, voltage-decrease rate, and rotor slip through fixed spatial participation coefficients under local converter current limits and DC-link voltage feedback. Case studies on a modified IEEE 33-bus feeder under Bus-32 three-phase faults demonstrate that, for the representative 140 ms fault, CTVS suppresses post-fault secondary voltage depression and reduces the sustained recovery delay to 23.85 ms, compared with 342.30 ms for local low-voltage ride-through and 390.85 ms for adaptive Q–V droop control. Matched ablations identify slip-conditioned support persistence as the principal contributor to sustained voltage recovery, whereas the fixed spatial coefficients provide a local allocation advantage under unsaturated conditions rather than a separate large-disturbance recovery benefit under the tested conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhou et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: