Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We develop a synthetic factor framework for systematic portfolio management in the US and European investment-grade corporate bond markets that explicitly accounts for time-varying factor exposures. Unlike conventional approaches that model interest rate and credit risks separately or rely on equity-based factors, our framework integrates both sources of systematic risk through four bond-specific factors: level, steepness, spread, and momentum. Our results show that factor exposures vary over time rather than remaining constant. Interest rate factors dominate during rate-driven dislocations, spread risk becomes the primary driver during periods of credit stress, and momentum is most relevant in tranquil, trending markets. These factors explain a substantial share of credit sector returns. We also document structural differences between the two markets: Interest rate factors dominate European investment-grade credit, whereas spread dynamics play a larger role in US investment-grade credit. Using factor-based predictive regressions to estimate expected returns, we identify consistent patterns across European and US credit portfolios. Overall, our findings show that bond-specific factors add explanatory value for corporate bond returns and provide a useful framework for systematic credit portfolio construction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Konstantinov et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: